FinanceWatchSM
Critical financial information, credible sources
If you are having difficulty seeing this mail or images in it, you can view it in your Web browser.
Volume 6, Issue 5     
In This Issue:

  Philanthropy with a business bent
  Giving at the office without going broke
  Most common resume lies
  The other energy crises
  Creating strategy in an unknowable universe
  The morning meeting ritual
  Make the most of your off-site
  Peter Drucker on Managerial courage
  Why technology negotiations are different
  How I make decisions
  Why dream teams fail
  How to build a great team
  RAZR’S edge
  Wired for winning loyalty
  Feeling the heat
  Continuous auditing not yet automatic
  Job picture bright for Finance, Accounting
  Sarbox burdens prompt CFO job churn
  Job satisfaction higher in Finance
  Warming up to performance dashboards
  Are you marathon material?


Philanthropy With A Business Bent

Warren Buffett's $35B giveaway
In an exclusive interview, the Berkshire Hathaway CEO speaks with FORTUNE's Carol Loomis about why he shifted gears, his relationship with Bill Gates and what it feels like to give away so much.
Under the dome of the Celeste Bartos Forum in the New York Public Library Monday, Warren Buffett signed five commitment letters, one each to the foundations run by his three children, one to the foundation in his late wife's name and one--the big $31 billion one--to the foundation run by his bridge partner and friend of 15 years, Bill Gates, and his wife, Melinda. At each stroke of his pen, each of the five doubled the size of its endowment as the world's second richest man started the process of turning over 85% of his $44 billion fortune. Even in inflation-adjusted dollars, Buffett will be giving away more money than John D. Rockefeller or Andrew Carnegie. For what must count as one of the most momentous days in philanthropy, it was a remarkably low-key affair. But that's the Cherry Coke Buffett way. "How often do you give away a billion dollars with a letter starting 'Dear Suse'," he joked to a roomful of foundation pros about the commitment to the foundation run by his daughter Susan. But the main event, his Gates Foundation donation, marked a serious coming of age of entrepreneurial philanthropy...
Read the article.  Back to top


Giving At The Office Without Going Broke

We've all been there. One month, there are three birthdays in your department. Then in the summer, your heart and purse strings get tugged by co-workers looking to be sponsored for this or that charity walk. Come fall, it's Girl Scout cookie time. And let's not forget the retirements and that guy a couple of cubicles over whose wife is pregnant...again. You smile, but you want to scream, "Leave me alone! Do you know how much I get paid?" It's a classic office-etiquette dilemma: To chip in or not to chip in. On the one hand, you don't want to seem like a grouch or a Grinch. On the other hand, you really don't want giving at the office to make you go broke. "What I find from companies I work with is employees are becoming very frustrated," says Jacqueline Whitmore, author of Business Class: Etiquette Essentials for Success at Work. [Between companies that make employee recognition a priority and those that don't, "we thought maybe there would be a 10% difference in profitability," says Adrian Gostick, O.C. Tanner's marketing director and author of The Invisible Employee. Instead, the survey indicated that companies with employee recognition programs have three times the return on equity. "It was quite startling," Gostick says.]...
Read the article.  Back to top


Most Common Resume Lies

From foolish fibs to full-on fraud, lying on your résumé is one of the most common ways that people stretch the truth. But think twice before you ship off your next half-baked job application. Even if your moral compass doesn't keep you from deceit, the fact that human resources is on to the game should.The percentage of people who lie to potential employers is substantial, says Sunny Bates, CEO of New York-based executive recruitment firm Sunny Bates Associates. She estimates that 40% of all résumés aren't altogether aboveboard. And this game of employment Russian roulette is getting riskier and riskier. Almost 40% of human resources professionals surveyed last year by the Society for Human Resource Management reported they've increased the amount of time they spend checking references over the past three years...
Read the article.  Back to top


The Other Energy Crisis

Read the front page of any newspaper or tune in to any newscast, and you’ll find near daily coverage of the global energy crisis and soaring fuel prices. But I’m convinced that the real energy crisis is not taking place in the oil fields of Texas and Iraq or the gas stations of New York and California, but rather inside the people and the companies that contribute to our global economy. In a 2004 survey conducted by Harris Interactive, less than 15% of Americans agree that they feel strongly energized by their work and only 20% feel very passionate about their jobs. The cost to corporate America of fatigue, burnout and a lack of engagement is staggering. The Gallup Organization estimates that cost to be $250 billion to $300 billion, while workplace fatigue alone costs U.S. businesses at least $77 billion per year, according to the National Sleep Foundation. Today’s employees are under-engaged, overtired and overstressed. Not convinced? Try eavesdropping on watercooler conversations. You won’t hear anything, because...
Read the article.  Back to top



Creating Strategy in an Unknowable Universe

In his book The Origin of Wealth, Eric D. Beinhocker argues that a radical new view sees economics as a highly dynamic and evolving system with implications for companies and organizations everywhere. An excerpt.





“We should think of strategy as a portfolio of experiments.”

“This shift in perspective implies a major redesign of the strategic planning process.”
Editor's note: In his new book The Origin of Wealth, McKinsey & Company Senior Advisor Eric D. Beinhocker argues that the traditional view of economics as a static, equilibrium-balanced system is going through a radical rethinking involving a multitude of disciplines. The new spin: "complexity economics," in which the economy is viewed as a highly dynamic and constantly evolving system that is all but impossible to predict. This excerpt deals with how companies can set strategy when the future is unknowable.

Strategy as a portfolio of experiments
The key to doing better is to "bring evolution inside" and get the wheels of differentiation, selection, and amplification spinning within a company's four walls. Rather than thinking of strategy as a single plan built on predictions of the future, we should think of strategy as a portfolio of experiments, a population of competing Business Plans that evolves over time. We will look at the elements of such an approach shortly, but first, an example will help illustrate what a portfolio of strategic experiments looks like. Let's return to the Microsoft story and imagine it is now the year 1987, six years after Gates signed the contract with IBM. The still nascent PC industry has just gone through a period of explosive growth. No one has ridden that growth harder than Microsoft. But MS-DOS is now coming to the end of its natural life cycle. Customers are beginning to look for a replacement operating system that will take better advantage of the graphics and greater power of the new generation of machines. A change in the S-curve is coming, and the industry is far from certain how things will work out. Despite its success, Microsoft was still a $346 million minnow in 1987 compared to the multibillion-dollar giants hungrily eyeing its lucrative position. IBM was developing its own powerful multitasking OS/2 system; AT&T was leading a consortium of other companies, including Sun Microsystems and Xerox, to create a user-friendly version of the widely admired Unix operating system; and Hewlett-Packard and Digital Equipment Corporation were pushing their own version of Unix. Apple was also still a threat, consistently out-innovating the rest of the industry, and its highly graphical Macintosh was selling well. We can imagine the options that Microsoft faced at this point. Option one: Gates could...
Read the article.  Back to top


The Morning Meeting Ritual

Is your organization plagued by inefficient communications, finger pointing, and lack of accountability? Get all key decision makers to the table—same time, every day. Welcome to Marty Linsky's The Morning Meeting. From Harvard Management Communication Letter.





“Issues cannot be covered over, and people can no longer hide.”
A global petrochemical company struggling to create a coherent strategy after a merger with a very different kind of firm. A small advertising and design house trying to manage itself during a time of rapid growth. A public agency facing a series of budget cuts that threaten core services and deeply held values. An established bank losing market share to new boutique players coming into its market and cherry-picking high-margin products. As diverse as the challenges facing these organizations seemed, when my colleagues and I looked closely, we recognized that they shared two closely linked underlying causes: chronic communication problems within the executive team and a lack of shared accountability. When communication is stifled and turf protection the order of the day, an organization's senior leadership team is less than the sum of its parts and cannot grapple with strategic and operational challenges most effectively. Expertise and energy go untapped: less than frank communication sometimes means that team members do not know the full extent of one another's issue; and a lack of shared accountability leads some to think, "Hey, that's his problem and he's got to fix it." In contrast, two qualities characterize high-functioning leadership teams:...
Read the article.  Back to top


Make the Most of Your Off-Site

The key: advance preparation. This means restricting in advance the scope and number of issues to a manageable few. And don't invite too many people. An excerpt from Harvard Business Review.





“The meeting is not the place to plod through data.”

“If most companies have too many participants, they have too few off-site sessions.”
A strategic off-site's success is largely determined by what happens before it convenes. To make sure the meeting generates tangible results, its designer must do three things. First, answer the most basic questions:...
Read the article.  Back to top




Peter Drucker on Managerial Courage

Each product, operation, and activity should be justified every two or three years, wrote Peter F. Drucker in 1963. But that's a hard step for managers to take. A Harvard Business Review classic.





Unfortunately I know of no procedure or checklist for managerial courage.
I do not propose to give here a full-blown "science of management economics," if only because I have none to give. Even less do I intend to present a magic formula, a "checklist" or "procedure" which will do the job for the manager. For his job is work—very hard, demanding, risk-taking work. And while there is plenty of laborsaving machinery around, no one has yet invented a "work-saving" machine, let alone a "think-saving" one. But I do claim that we know how to organize the job of managing for economic effectiveness and how to do it with both direction and results. The answers to the [following] three key questions . . . are known, and have been known for such a long time that they should not surprise anyone.

1. What is the manager's job? It is to direct the resources and efforts of the business toward opportunities for economically significant results. This sounds trite—and it is. But every analysis of actual allocation of resources and efforts in business that I have ever seen or made showed clearly that the bulk of time, work, attention, and money first goes to "problems" rather than to opportunities, and, secondly, to areas where even extraordinarily successful performance will have minimum impact on results.

2. What is the major problem?...
Read the article.  Back to top


Why Technology Negotiations Are Different

Technology negotiations are complex and many managers are left with a sense of unease. Am I getting the best deal? Will the ERP system I buy today be obsolete tomorrow? Lawrence Susskind offers keys to help you avoid the pitfalls. From Negotiation.





Executives are increasingly faced with the task of negotiating in a realm that many know little about: technology. Whether you're bargaining over the purchase of a new companywide network, coping with a possible infringement of patented technology, or seeking better customer service from a software supplier, technology negotiations have become a fact of managerial life. How do such negotiations differ from those that are less technologically complex? You can anticipate four specific problems to crop up more often in the technology arena:...
Read the article.  Back to top




How I make decisions

FORTUNE asked eight bold, creative people - from the next chairman of the Joint Chiefs, to the man who found Harry Potter, to the woman who picks next year's hip colors - to describe what guides their decision-making. Here is what they said...
Read the article.  Back to top


Why dream teams fail

It may be tempting to recruit all-stars and let 'em rip. Don't do it. Dream teams often become nightmares of dysfunction. In what universe is it even conceivable that the United States could fail to reach the semifinals of something called the World Baseball Classic? Not only fail to win, but could field a team that included Roger Clemens, Derek Jeter, Alex Rodriguez, and Johnny Damon and then lose games to Mexico, South Korea, and - wait for it - Canada? Yet it happened this year. How could a movie starring Brad Pitt, George Clooney, Catherine Zeta-Jones, and Julia Roberts, directed by Steven Soderbergh, get tepid reviews and gross less worldwide than the star-free My Big Fat Greek Wedding? That movie was Ocean's Twelve. And how could a FORTUNE 500 company run by a brilliant former McKinsey consultant, paying fat salaries to graduates of America's elite business schools, dissolve into fraud and bankruptcy? It happened at Enron... If someone tells you you're being recruited onto a dream team, maybe you should run. In our team-obsessed age, the concept of the dream team has become irresistible. But it's brutally clear that they often blow up. Why?...
Read the article.  Back to top


How to build a great team

Harmony. Cooperation. Synchronized effort. It's difficult, but it can be learned. Watch the great teams very closely - and then join one of your own. FORTUNE Magazine) - In 1972, a crack commando unit was sent to prison by a military court for a crime they didn't commit. These four men promptly escaped from a maximum-security stockade to the Los Angeles underground. Today, still wanted by the government, they survive as soldiers of fortune. If you have a problem, if no one else can help, and if you can find them, maybe you can hire the A-Team. The A-Team went off the air in 1987 - still wanted by the government - but television has never produced a better blueprint for team building. The key elements of its effectiveness: a cigar-chomping master of disguise, an ace pilot, a devilishly handsome con man, a mechanic with a mohawk and an amazingly sweet van. Those particulars might not translate to all business settings. But clear definition of roles is a hallmark of effective collaboration. So is small team size - though four is slightly below the optimal number [of]...
Read the article.  Back to top


RAZR'S edge

How a team of engineers and designers defied Motorola's own rules to create the cellphone that revived their company. Hundreds of Motorolans jammed into a company auditorium in Schaumburg, Ill., last December to mourn the sudden death of their storyteller-in-chief. It was a bittersweet moment for Motorola. Geoffrey Frost, the 56-year-old marketing genius responsible for the company's snappy "Hello Moto" ad campaign, had died in his sleep of a heart attack two weeks earlier. Thanks in no small part to Frost's dramatic flair, the proud but humbled company was on the upswing for the first time in years. CEO Ed Zander, who eulogized Frost that day, had promoted him to executive vice president only hours before he died. Frost, you see, had become a symbol of Motorola's resurgence as an unexpectedly stylish technology powerhouse.For a few engineers and industrial designers attending the memorial service, though, Frost represented something more. The celebration of his life drew attention to their greatest accomplishment, the creation just two years earlier of the ultrathin, superhip RAZR V3, the hottest Motorola phone in nearly a decade. Frost had been the phone's cheerleader; he'd come up with its catchy four-letter name. He also had spun an appealing narrative about how Motorola was cool again, and a myth about the slick downtown Chicago design studio where the phone had taken shape. The story behind the RAZR's creation. What the unsung team of heroes knew, however, was that the actual story of how the RAZR came to be is even more compelling than, if not quite as glamorous as, the version Frost had peddled...
Read the article.  Back to top



Wired for Winning Loyalty

The 'Tail' of the Headline: Rethinking the Call to Action
Do you hear the "call of the wired"? You should. In the US alone, a whopping 70% of the population (adults 18+) now uses the Internet. What's more, reports the Pew Internet Project, on a typical day 38% of wired adults use a search engine and 30% go online just for fun or to pass the time. Bottom line: The wired world is brimming with purchase potential and it's high time to answer the call. Are you...
  • Harnessing wired (and wireless) innovations to woo prospective buyers?
  • Tapping into the ever-evolving treasure chest of wired capabilities to transform one-time purchasers into staunch advocates?
Consider the following five firms and how each is using wired solutions to address the multi-stage challenges of growing loyal customers...
Read the article.  Back to top




Feeling the heat

America's Federal Reserve gets a touch of the vapours. Central bankers are supposed to be calm, even a little boring. But the governors of America's Federal Reserve seem to have been seized by a sudden panic about inflation. Virtually every Fed official has been worrying aloud about rising prices. Ben Bernanke, the Fed's chairman, warned about “unwelcome” inflation on June 5th. Since then his colleagues have declared it to be “troubling”, beyond their “comfort level” and even “corrosive”. This hawkish talk has not been lost on financial markets, which now take for granted that the federal funds rate will be pushed up by a quarter of a percentage point, to 5.25%, at the end of the central bankers' next meeting on June 28th and 29th. Judging by the price of futures contracts, markets see a better than even chance of another quarter-point rise in August. Several forecasters believe that short-term rates will reach 6% by early 2007. Less than two months ago, Wall Street was worried that Mr Bernanke's Fed would be too soft on inflation. Now the opposite fear has taken hold. A rising chorus wails that Fed officials have become obsessed with monthly inflation figures and that their fixation will cause them to push interest rates too high and tip the economy into recession. David Rosenberg, chief economist at Merrill Lynch, puts the odds of a recession in 2007 above 40%. The idea that the Fed worries too much about inflation comes from several quarters....
Read the article.  Back to top



Continuous Auditing Not Yet Automatic

About half of the companies that practice it also incorporate some automated elements, according to a new survey, though only a few companies have shed their manual processes entirely. Half of U.S. companies now use "continuous auditing" techniques, according to a new survey by PricewaterhouseCoopers, and 31 percent of the rest have already made plans to do likewise. "This may be the beginning of a significant change in the way internal auditing has traditionally been done," said PwC partner Dick Anderson, in a press release. A total of 392 companies responded to the survey...
Read the article.  Back to top


Job Picture Bright for Finance, Accounting

Chief financial officers are apparently in a hiring mood. According to the latest quarterly survey from Robert Half International, 7 percent of CFOs expect to bring on full-time accounting or finance employees in the third quarter, while 3 percent anticipate reductions in personnel. The staffing firm noted that for the second quarter, the spread between hiring and cutbacks was just a single percentage point. The national poll includes responses from more than 1,400 CFOs from U.S. companies with 20 or more employees...
Read the article.  Back to top


Sarbox Burdens Prompt CFO Job Churn

Will Sarbanes-Oxley turn CFOs back into bean counters? Finance chiefs have had little time for strategy in the four years since the law was passed, according to a study by a prominent headhunting firm. Here's one more thing to blame on the Sarbanes-Oxley Act: an increase in job churn for CFOs of Fortune 500 companies. A study released this month by Russell Reynolds Associates found that 19 percent of large-company finance chiefs left their posts in 2005, up from 16 percent the previous year and 13 percent in 2003. While resignations helped boost the total, promotions did not...
Read the article.  Back to top










Job Satisfaction Higher in Finance

Accounting and finance employees are more likely than the overall workforce to have received a raise within the last year and more likely to receive quarterly performance reviews. Finance executives seem more satisfied with their jobs than most other workers, according to a new survey by human-capital consultancy Hudson. Some 34 percent of accounting and finance workers reported being very satisfied with their compensation, compared with just 28 percent of all survey respondents. And 78 percent are very or somewhat satisfied with their jobs, compared with 72 percent for the survey population as a whole...
Read the article.  Back to top



Warming Up to Performance Dashboards

Dashboards that monitor organizational performance can spark a great awakening within the businesses that use them. Instead of waiting a month or two to see how actuals compare with plans, dashboard users are alerted to a performance shortfall almost as soon as it occurs, so they have the chance to head it off early. That fosters a more proactive approach to managing the business, empowers workers to act confidently and helps them do their job better. Yet despite the undeniable benefits of dashboards, this type of tool isn't always embraced by everybody in a company. In fact, it may serve as an unhappy awakening for some constituents. Receiving performance information virtually instantaneously changes how workers work and how managers manage, which is bound to ruffle a few feathers. Performance dashboards increase individual accountability and responsibility. Suddenly, everyone may be able to see how everyone else is doing from one day to the next. While some corporate cultures are comfortable making dramatic changes in the way their employees are judged, many don't take such changes easily in stride. Convincing people within these resistant environments to warm up to dashboard technology can be an uphill battle. "It's hard to get people to use the dashboards -- even though they're flashy performance tools -- in part because people have become comfortable with the reams of performance reports that they see every month," says Craig Schiff, president of BPM Partners in Stamford, Conn. "In addition, people tend to think that dashboards make the company look too summarized, too encapsulated, to be of any significant value."...
Read the article.  Back to top




Are you marathon material?

Runners start the New York City Marathon last November. The running of the 36th annual road race featured one of the most competitive fields ever, including 35,000 participants from 99 countries and all 50 U.S. states.
Endurance events are trendy, but crossing the finish line is still tough. Jacob Havenar ran his first marathon in 2000 with some soccer buddies who were looking for a new challenge. His motivation to keep up with the guys — and earn bragging rights — helped him make it to the finish line. But his main drive came from deeper within. "It's nice to be able to say you've done a marathon," he says. "But for me, the part that meant the most was the sense of personal accomplishment. It changed my life. It made me feel like I could do anything in the world." Like Havenar, more and more first-time marathoners are getting in the race. Statistics from USA Track and Field show that more than 400,000 runners now compete in an estimated 400 U.S. marathons each year, up from about 236,000 participants in 1990. Marathon running is increasingly popular for several reasons, Havenar and others say. Some people are inspired by success stories common in the media and want to achieve such a big personal goal. Some are hoping to improve their health or lose weight. Others want to do a good deed; more participants are now competing to raise money for their favorite charity. And why they decide to participate may make a big difference in whether they'll succeed, according to new research by Havenar, now a doctoral candidate in physical activity, nutrition and wellness at Arizona State University. Going the distance isn't for everyone...
Read the article.  Back to top



Forward to a Friend:
Do you have a friend that would like to receive FinanceWatchsm? Perhaps you know a peer within your organization, or associate at a partner company that would benefit from applying to receive this publication. Inviting a friend to experience the benefits of joining the BusinessWatch Network is easy! Just FW: this newsletter to the person you know who may have an interest and ask them to click here http://www.businesswatchnetwork.com Your friend will be glad you did!

If at any time you would like to unsubscribe from FinanceWatchsm simply change your status, or send a letter requesting opt-off to: The BusinessWatch Network Privacy Mailbox, 1321, Marblehead, MA. 01945

DISCLAIMER: FinanceWatchsm and the BusinessWatch Networksm are service marks of DMS. All other trademarks or service marks contained in this email are the property of their respective owners. At the time of publication, all links in this e-mail functioned properly. However, since many links point to sites other than businesswatchnetwork.com, some links may become invalid as time passes.

DMS Inc. supports the DMA Privacy Promise and Guidelines for Ethical Business Practice. We are committed to the proper use of email and to protecting consumers from fraudulent or inappropriate offers. Privacy Policy